Flyers wrote:I'm in.
27 is way too young for UFA. And one early re-sign is not enough
I think it's better to let teams keep more UFA so there is more trading.
Seems like most of prior year activity was in UFA period, then teams get capped out and it is hard to trade
FloridaGMPJ wrote:I fully understand there are going to be age differences. There also is going to be a divide on how we address the age issue. So no matter what system we implement, there will be differing opinions. My feeling is, the age rollbacks will likely happen to guys who are older, so that a GM can keep a player longer. So to do that, they take a hit on OV. If McNeil is 70 OV at Age 28, and 66 OV at Age 23, isn't he pretty much a depth player regardless? I don't see a major issue there.
I get that no system will be perfect, so the age rollbacks are an option teams have to roll certain guys back if they wish, and that'll keep our player pool from dwindling further.
What I'm not doing is leaving things as is, without making any change. I'm not going to do all this work to run the league for 4 more seasons, then we are back to the same spot with losing players, not enough are coming in, UFA Pools are junk, rosters are thin, etc.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests